With so many freelancers cropping up from all corners of the world, work doesn’t always need to be done in one country. For example, a person based out of Australia may get the work done from a freelancer in Philippines or China. In conventional terms, this could be defined as outsourcing over the freelancing model.
This definition though doesn’t apply to this case – The person in Australia prefers getting the work done from someone in Australia, who freelances. In this case, the work hasn’t really gone anywhere, and thus here, freelancing takes a separate line from outsourcing.
For quite some years now, industry experts are divided whether to call freelancing as a form of outsourcing or not. The logic is simple – Work for a company is not being done in the company, and by someone else employed by the company on a contract basis, and in this arrangement, it is fair in calling the deal a freelance outsourcing deal.
This is precisely the point – There are so many contexts associated with the domain of freelancing that you may get lost in this. The simpler way out is – To just forget all the definitions, and do your work. If you are a freelancer, just accept the work, finish it and get paid. If you are a buyer, choose the freelancer, get the work, and pay for the services.
At the end of the day, what matters to a freelancer is if he is getting work and money, and in return, buyers get their work done. Until the time this happens, all arguments on whether freelancing is outsourcing or not, can be put aside.
But quietly, industry experts would still wish to carry forward flames of this topic ahead. With the Grassley-Durbin Bill assuming some impetus in the Obama administration, experts wish to find some answers to this question quickly.For freelance writing oppurtunities visit http://www.freelanceradar.com/ now !
